A colleague has just called my attention to the following slice of awesomeness.
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on "ontological arguments," describing Malcom's famous paper:
"Defence of modal ontological arguments by a famous ordinary philosopher.”
The author seems to have left out the word ‘language’ after 'ordinary', but then again....
3 comments:
I don't think it's a mistake at all, actually!
That SEP article strikes me as bizarre in its organization. (Parodies before Anselm?)
Great ordinary love and sadness
Post a Comment