I was just printing out a recommendation letter for a student. I had a sentence in it about how the student has a background interest in Philosophy of Law, and even has a paper accepted about some current work by Joseph Raz.
I'm glad I caught the typo in the sentence that said: "Ms. Y has recently had a paper accepted for publication at [very good journal name here] on recent work by Rza"
Then again, maybe I should have kept it in? It's about time that philosophers began giving serious attention to the Wu-Tang Clan.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Then again, it might lead to some awkward email exchanges: "Which Old Dirty Bastard did you mean?"
I thought you disliked the whole Pop Culture and Philosophy trend?
Sentences speak?
I'd leave it in. The committee might infer that the candidate is nothing to fuck with.
It's a good thing the paper wan't on the well-known philosopher of science Gaz.
"I was just printing our a recommendation"
Uh, typo?
Bill Murray!
6:26,
Corrected now. Thanks, jerk.
P H I L O S O P H I C A L M E T H O D man. P H I L O S O P H I C A L M E T H O D man. Here I am, here I am, the Philosophical Method Man...
Word Verification: Phytt (and my new term for a philosophical disagreement).
Post a Comment