If this is not intentionally a cruel joke at the expense of the author of the book allegedly under discussion, it's unintentionally so. Does anyone on the editorial staff even bother to look at the reviews before posting them? If this doesn't fall way short of the standard for minimal acceptability for a book review in a professional venue, then there simply is no standard, and one might as well read reviews on amazon.com.
I greatly appreciate the service you are providing to the profession. But lately this kind of thing has been happening entirely too often on your otherwise excellent site. You need to do better.